PPWR Restricted Packaging Formats Guide for 2030
Restricted packaging formats are one of the most business-critical parts of the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, known as the PPWR. These rules directly affect whether certain packaging formats can continue to be placed on the EU market after the relevant deadlines.
For many companies, packaging restrictions are more than a sustainability issue. They can affect product design, retail displays, hospitality operations, hotel amenities, food service packaging, fresh produce packaging, procurement contracts, supplier selection, stock planning, packaging artwork, and EU market access.
Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste entered into force on 11 February 2025 and will generally apply from 12 August 2026. The European Commission explains that the PPWR covers all packaging and packaging waste, regardless of material or origin, and sets requirements for manufacturing, composition, reusable or recoverable nature, waste management, and waste prevention.
The PPWR also introduces requirements to limit unnecessary packaging and increase reusable options, supporting the EU’s objective to reduce packaging waste and move toward more circular packaging systems.
The attached packaging compliance workshop identifies “Restrictions on Certain Packaging Formats” as a dedicated PPWR compliance area. It covers prohibited packaging formats under Annex V, delayed bans from 1 January 2030, micro-company exemptions, single-use grouped packaging, single-use packaging for fresh fruit and vegetables, HORECA food and beverage packaging, single-use condiment packaging, hotel miniature packaging, very lightweight plastic carrier bags, and the link between packaging restrictions and formal non-compliance.
For companies placing packaged products on the EU market, the key message is clear: restricted packaging formats should be reviewed now, because redesigning packaging, qualifying alternatives, updating supplier contracts, and changing operational processes can take time.
What Are Restricted Packaging Formats Under PPWR?
Restricted packaging formats are packaging formats or uses that the PPWR prohibits or restricts because they are considered unnecessary, avoidable, or inconsistent with EU waste prevention and circular economy goals.
The restrictions are mainly focused on certain single-use packaging formats, especially where reusable, refillable, unpackaged, or less wasteful alternatives may be possible.
The workshop explains that certain types of packaging listed in Annex V cannot be placed on the market, and that some packaging formats listed in Point 3 of Annex V are banned starting 1 January 2030. It also notes that Member States may exempt micro-companies from certain restrictions where it is not technically feasible to avoid the banned packaging or switch to a reuse system.
In practical business terms, restricted packaging formats may affect:
- Retail multipacks
- Fresh fruit and vegetable packaging
- HORECA food and beverage packaging
- Single-use condiment portions
- Hotel miniatures and toiletry packaging
- Very lightweight plastic carrier bags
- Certain plastic grouped packaging formats
- Certain composite or other single-use packaging formats
The restrictions should be reviewed at packaging-format level, not only at material level. A company needs to understand what the packaging is used for, where it is used, whether it is single-use, whether it is plastic or composite, and whether any exemption or justification applies.
Why Restricted Packaging Formats Matter for Market Access
Restricted packaging formats matter because they can directly determine whether packaging can continue to be used in the EU market after the relevant deadline.
A product may be compliant from a safety, chemical, labelling, and product performance perspective, but if it is sold in a restricted packaging format, the packaging can create market access risk.
Business risks of restricted packaging formats
|
Risk Area |
Business Impact |
|
Product launch delays |
Packaging redesign may be needed before EU sale |
|
Retail rejection |
Retailers may refuse products in restricted packaging formats |
|
Hospitality disruption |
HORECA and hotel businesses may need new service models |
|
Supplier changes |
Alternative packaging formats may need qualification |
|
Cost impact |
Reusable, refillable, or redesigned packaging may change cost structures |
|
Stock write-off |
Non-compliant packaging stock may become unusable after restrictions apply |
|
Marketplace issues |
Online sellers may need evidence of packaging compliance |
|
Customer complaints |
Excessive or banned packaging can damage brand trust |
|
Enforcement risk |
Authorities may require corrective action for restricted packaging use |
|
Documentation gaps |
Companies may need evidence showing why an exemption applies |
The European Commission states that packaging waste is growing faster than economies and population, and describes packaging waste as often unnecessary and burdensome. Restricted packaging format rules are therefore part of a wider PPWR strategy to reduce avoidable packaging and promote better packaging design.
Key Deadline: 1 January 2030
The most important date for restricted packaging formats is 1 January 2030.
The workshop states that from 1 January 2030, there is a ban on placing on the market packaging formats and uses listed in Annex V. It also notes that the European Commission is expected to provide guidelines within 24 months after the regulation’s entry into force, in consultation with Member States and the European Food Safety Authority, to clarify the scope of Annex V.
The official PPWR framework is already in force, and the Commission guidance document confirms that Regulation (EU) 2025/40 entered into force on 11 February 2025 and applies from 12 August 2026.
Practical restricted-format timeline
|
Date / Period |
Business Relevance |
|
11 February 2025 |
PPWR entered into force |
|
12 August 2026 |
General PPWR application date |
|
2026–2027 |
Implementation guidance and clarification continue |
|
1 January 2030 |
Main Annex V packaging format restrictions apply |
|
After 2030 |
Companies must monitor additional guidance, national measures, and future amendments |
Companies should not wait until 2030 to start reviewing packaging. For many businesses, especially those with global packaging lines, private-label products, retailer approvals, packaging molds, food-contact packaging, hospitality operations, or supplier contracts, 2030 preparation should start years earlier.
Restricted Packaging Formats at a Glance
The workshop identifies several restricted packaging formats and uses under PPWR Annex V. The following table summarizes the main categories and practical examples.
|
Restricted Packaging Format |
Restricted Use |
Illustrative Examples |
|
Single-use plastic grouped packaging |
Plastic packaging used at retail level to group goods and encourage purchase of more than one product, excluding grouped packaging necessary for handling in distribution |
Collation films, shrink wrap |
|
Single-use packaging for fresh fruit and vegetables |
Single-use plastic, composite, or other single-use packaging for less than 1.5 kg fresh fruit and vegetables, unless there is a demonstrated need |
Nets, bags, trays, containers |
|
Single-use food and beverage packaging in HORECA |
Single-use packaging for foods and beverages filled and consumed within HORECA premises |
Trays, disposable plates, cups, bags, foil, boxes |
|
Single-use condiment and serving packaging in HORECA |
Individual portions or servings of condiments, preserves, sauces, coffee creamer, sugar, and seasoning, subject to specific exceptions |
Sachets, tubs, trays, boxes |
|
Single-use hotel miniature packaging |
Packaging for cosmetics, hygiene, and toiletry products below size thresholds for individual accommodation bookings |
Shampoo bottles, lotion bottles, soap sachets |
|
Very lightweight plastic carrier bags |
Very lightweight plastic bags, except where required for hygiene or loose food waste prevention |
Produce bags and similar bags |
The workshop also notes that Annex V includes single-use accommodation sector packaging intended for an individual booking and very lightweight plastic carrier bags.
Single-Use Plastic Grouped Packaging
Single-use plastic grouped packaging is one of the key restricted formats.
The workshop defines this category as plastic packaging used at retail level to group goods sold in cans, tins, pots, tubs, and packets, where the packaging is designed as convenience packaging to enable or encourage end users to purchase more than one product. It excludes grouped packaging necessary to facilitate handling in distribution.
Examples
|
Format |
Risk |
|
Plastic collation film around multipacks |
May be restricted if used mainly to encourage multi-buy sales |
|
Shrink wrap around retail cans or bottles |
May be restricted if not necessary for distribution handling |
|
Plastic rings or grouped convenience packaging |
May require alternative design |
|
Plastic wrap around tubs, pots, or tins |
Should be assessed by purpose and use |
|
Retail promotional bundling packaging |
May be high-risk where used mainly to increase sales volume |
Practical business questions
|
Question |
Why It Matters |
|
Is the packaging used at retail level? |
Retail convenience grouping is a key restriction area |
|
Is it necessary for distribution handling? |
Distribution handling packaging may be treated differently |
|
Does it encourage purchase of more than one product? |
This may place it in the restricted category |
|
Is there a non-plastic or reusable alternative? |
Alternative packaging may be needed |
|
Is the grouped packaging documented by function? |
Evidence may help distinguish distribution need from retail convenience |
Companies should review all retail multipack formats and clearly separate packaging used for consumer promotion from packaging used for transport or distribution protection.
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Packaging
Single-use packaging for fresh fruit and vegetables is another major restricted category.
The workshop states that single-use plastic packaging, single-use composite packaging, or other single-use packaging for less than 1.5 kg of fresh fruit and vegetables is restricted unless there is a demonstrated need to avoid water loss, turgidity loss, microbiological hazards, or physical shocks.
Examples
|
Packaging Format |
Practical Risk |
|
Plastic nets |
May be restricted for fresh produce under 1.5 kg |
|
Plastic bags |
May be restricted unless justified |
|
Trays |
May be restricted depending on product and need |
|
Containers |
May require evidence of necessity |
|
Composite produce packaging |
May also be in scope depending on design and use |
When packaging may still be justified
|
Justification |
Practical Meaning |
|
Avoiding water loss |
Packaging prevents product dehydration |
|
Avoiding turgidity loss |
Packaging helps maintain firmness and quality |
|
Avoiding microbiological hazards |
Packaging protects food safety |
|
Avoiding physical shocks |
Packaging protects fragile produce |
|
Preventing food waste |
Packaging may be necessary for preservation or safety |
The key point is evidence. If a company continues using single-use packaging for fresh produce under 1.5 kg, it should be able to demonstrate why the packaging is necessary.
Practical preparation steps
Companies should:
1- Identify all fresh fruit and vegetable packaging under 1.5 kg.
2- Classify material type and packaging format.
3- Assess whether packaging is necessary for food safety, quality, or damage prevention.
4- Collect supplier and technical evidence.
5- Evaluate unpackaged, reusable, paper-based, or other compliant alternatives.
6- Monitor Commission guidance and Member State implementation.
HORECA Food and Beverage Packaging Consumed on Premises
The HORECA sector includes hotels, restaurants, cafés, catering, and similar food service operations. Under PPWR, certain single-use packaging formats used for foods and beverages consumed on premises are restricted.
The workshop describes this category as single-use plastic, single-use composite, or other single-use packaging for foods and beverages filled and consumed within the premises in the HORECA sector. It includes eating areas inside and outside a place of business, areas with tables and stools, standing areas, and shared eating areas offered by several operators or third parties for food and drink consumption.
Examples
|
Packaging Format |
Practical Risk |
|
Disposable plates |
Restricted where used for on-premises consumption |
|
Disposable cups |
Restricted where used for on-premises consumption |
|
Single-use trays |
May need replacement with reusable service items |
|
Single-use bags or foil |
May be restricted for on-premises filled foods |
|
Disposable food boxes |
May be restricted when food is consumed within premises |
Practical questions for HORECA operators
|
Question |
Why It Matters |
|
Is the food or beverage consumed on premises? |
On-premises consumption is a key trigger |
|
Is the packaging single-use? |
Reusable alternatives may be required |
|
Is the packaging plastic, composite, or another single-use format? |
Several material types may be relevant |
|
Is the packaging used for take-away instead? |
Take-away may be assessed differently |
|
Is a reusable service model feasible? |
Reuse systems may need planning |
|
Are staff trained on when single-use formats are allowed? |
Operational mistakes can create compliance risk |
HORECA businesses should start by mapping where products are consumed: on premises, take-away, delivery, event catering, or mixed-use situations.
Single-Use Condiment and Serving Packaging in HORECA
Single-use condiment and serving packaging is another important restriction area.
The workshop identifies single-use packaging in the HORECA sector containing individual portions or servings used for condiments, preserves, sauces, coffee creamer, sugar, and seasoning. It notes an exception where such packaging is provided together with take-away ready-prepared food intended for immediate consumption without further preparation.
Examples
|
Product |
Restricted Packaging Examples |
|
Condiments |
Ketchup, mustard, mayonnaise sachets |
|
Sauces |
Single-serve sauce tubs or trays |
|
Preserves |
Jam or honey portions |
|
Coffee creamer |
Single-use creamer portions |
|
Sugar |
Individual sugar sachets |
|
Seasoning |
Salt, pepper, spice portions |
Practical alternatives to assess
|
Alternative |
Business Consideration |
|
Refillable dispensers |
Hygiene and cleaning procedures are required |
|
Bulk serving systems |
Portion control and food safety must be managed |
|
Reusable containers |
Reconditioning and tracking may be needed |
|
Service-on-request model |
Reduces unnecessary single-use portions |
|
Larger shared containers |
May reduce packaging waste but requires hygiene controls |
|
Take-away-specific packaging |
Exception must be assessed carefully |
HORECA operators should not assume that all condiment sachets are banned in every situation. The use case matters. However, individual portions for on-premises use should be reviewed as a priority.
Single-Use Hotel Miniature Packaging
Hotel miniature packaging is a high-visibility restricted format because it is commonly used for cosmetics, hygiene, and toiletry products.
The workshop identifies single-use hotel miniature packaging for cosmetics, hygiene, and toiletry products of less than 50 ml for liquid products or less than 100 g for non-liquid products. Examples include shampoo bottles, hand and body lotion bottles, and sachets around miniature bar soap.
Examples
|
Product |
High-Risk Packaging Format |
|
Shampoo |
Miniature single-use bottle below 50 ml |
|
Conditioner |
Miniature single-use bottle below 50 ml |
|
Body lotion |
Miniature single-use bottle below 50 ml |
|
Shower gel |
Miniature single-use bottle below 50 ml |
|
Soap |
Sachet around miniature bar soap below 100 g |
|
Hygiene items |
Individually packaged small toiletry portions |
Practical alternatives for hospitality businesses
|
Alternative |
Compliance Consideration |
|
Refillable dispensers |
Must meet hygiene, cleaning, and product quality controls |
|
Larger reusable containers |
Reduces single-use packaging but needs refill management |
|
Guest-request model |
May reduce unnecessary default distribution |
|
Bulk amenities |
May need tamper resistance and hygiene procedures |
|
Supplier-managed refill system |
Requires supplier evidence and operational controls |
|
Sustainable procurement policy |
Helps standardize alternatives across properties |
Hotels and accommodation providers should start by reviewing all in-room amenities, bathroom products, guest kits, spa products, and housekeeping supplies.
Very Lightweight Plastic Carrier Bags
Very lightweight plastic carrier bags are also addressed under PPWR waste prevention rules.
The workshop identifies a ban on very lightweight plastic carrier bags, except where required for hygiene reasons or provided as sales packaging for loose food when this helps prevent food waste. It also notes that Member States may require compostability for lightweight and very lightweight plastic carrier bags on their territories.
The EUR-Lex summary confirms that very lightweight bags are banned unless used for hygiene or to prevent food waste, and that Member States may decide whether very lightweight bags must be compostable in their territories.
Practical examples
|
Bag Use |
Risk / Consideration |
|
Loose produce bags |
May be allowed where needed for hygiene or food waste prevention |
|
Thin checkout bags |
High-risk and may be restricted |
|
Bags for wet or unpackaged food |
Hygiene justification may apply |
|
Bags for bakery or fresh food |
Must be assessed by use and local rule |
|
Compostable produce bags |
May be allowed or required in some Member States |
|
Non-essential small bags |
High-risk where not needed for hygiene or food waste prevention |
Retailers should assess bag use by department, not only at store level. Produce, bakery, meat, fish, delicatessen, pharmacy, and general checkout areas may have different justifications.
Micro-Company Exemptions and Special Cases
The workshop notes that where a small business qualifies as a micro-company under EU rules and it is not technically feasible to avoid the banned packaging or switch to a reuse system, Member States may exempt them from the ban in Point 3 of Annex V.
This exemption should be treated carefully. Companies should not assume that being small automatically creates an exemption. The exemption depends on legal status, technical feasibility, Member State implementation, and the specific packaging format.
Exemption evidence checklist
|
Evidence |
Why It Matters |
|
Company size assessment |
Shows whether the business may qualify as a micro-company |
|
Packaging format identification |
Confirms which Annex V point is relevant |
|
Technical feasibility assessment |
Explains why alternatives are not feasible |
|
Reuse system assessment |
Shows whether switching to reuse was considered |
|
Member State rule check |
Confirms whether the exemption is available locally |
|
Documentation date |
Shows when the decision was made |
|
Review process |
Ensures exemption is reassessed as business or infrastructure changes |
Exemptions should be documented and reviewed regularly, especially where packaging alternatives become available.
National Restrictions and SUPD Interaction
Companies should also consider the relationship between PPWR restrictions and existing national restrictions under the Single-Use Plastics Directive, known as SUPD.
The workshop explains that SUPD generally prevails over PPWR unless otherwise provided, and that Member States may maintain existing packaging bans related to certain Annex V formats until 1 January 2030. It also notes that PPWR bans apply from 1 January 2030 and that expanded polystyrene food containers, beverage containers, and cups for beverages are already banned under SUPD, with PPWR amendments adding XPS formats after a later application period.
Why this matters
|
Topic |
Practical Impact |
|
Existing national bans |
Some countries may already restrict certain packaging formats |
|
SUPD bans |
Certain single-use plastic products may already be prohibited |
|
PPWR harmonization |
From 2030, PPWR Annex V restrictions become central |
|
Composite packaging |
Partial plastic content may still trigger single-use plastic obligations |
|
Market-by-market review |
Companies must check both EU and national rules during transition |
Companies should not assume that 2030 is the first time packaging restrictions matter. In some Member States, national restrictions may already apply.
Composite Packaging and Partial Plastic Content
Composite packaging can create confusion because some packaging contains more than one material.
The workshop explains that composite packaging is a packaging unit made of two or more materials that form part of the main packaging material and cannot be separated manually, unless one material is insignificant and no more than 5% of the total mass, excluding labels, varnishes, paints, inks, adhesives, and lacquers. It also notes that the definition of composite packaging should not exempt single-use packaging partially made of plastic from Single-Use Plastics Directive requirements.
Practical questions for composite packaging
|
Question |
Why It Matters |
|
Does the packaging contain plastic? |
Partial plastic content may trigger additional obligations |
|
Can materials be separated manually? |
Affects composite packaging classification |
|
Is one material below the 5% threshold? |
May affect PPWR composite assessment |
|
Is the packaging single-use? |
Single-use status is important for restrictions |
|
Does SUPD apply? |
SUPD may still apply where plastic is present |
|
Is the format listed in Annex V? |
Use case and format determine restriction risk |
Companies using composite packaging should maintain accurate material breakdowns and avoid assuming that a small plastic fraction automatically removes regulatory risk.
Which Sectors Are Most Affected?
Restricted packaging formats affect multiple sectors, but some are more exposed than others.
High-impact sectors
|
Sector |
Relevant Restricted Formats |
|
Retail |
Single-use grouped packaging, plastic bags, fresh produce packaging |
|
Food and beverage |
HORECA packaging, condiment portions, fresh produce packaging, plastic bags |
|
HORECA |
On-premises single-use food and beverage packaging, condiment sachets |
|
Hospitality |
Hotel miniature cosmetics, hygiene, and toiletry packaging |
|
Cosmetics and personal care |
Hotel amenities, small single-use formats, refill alternatives |
|
Agriculture and fresh produce |
Packaging for fruit and vegetables below 1.5 kg |
|
E-commerce |
May be affected where packaging formats overlap with restricted single-use formats |
|
Private label |
Retailers may control packaging design and supplier requirements |
|
Packaging suppliers |
Must develop compliant alternatives and documentation |
|
Importers |
Must verify that imported packaged goods do not use restricted formats |
Companies should identify affected product categories and prioritize high-volume, high-risk, or customer-facing packaging formats.
Practical Alternatives to Restricted Packaging Formats
Companies should start evaluating alternatives early. However, the right alternative depends on product safety, hygiene, logistics, shelf life, consumer use, and waste infrastructure.
Possible alternative strategies
|
Restricted Format |
Possible Alternatives to Assess |
|
Single-use plastic grouped packaging |
Paper-based grouping, reusable crates, distribution-only grouping, shelf-ready packaging redesign |
|
Fresh fruit and vegetable packaging |
Loose sale, reusable crates, paper-based packaging, packaging only where justified by food safety or quality |
|
HORECA on-premises packaging |
Reusable plates, cups, trays, bowls, cutlery and service systems |
|
Condiment sachets |
Refillable dispensers, bulk containers, reusable serving containers, service-on-request systems |
|
Hotel miniatures |
Refillable dispensers, larger reusable containers, guest-request models, supplier-managed refill systems |
|
Very lightweight plastic bags |
No bag, reusable produce bags, compostable bags where allowed or required, bags only for hygiene or food waste prevention |
Alternative packaging should be tested before implementation. Companies should assess product protection, consumer acceptance, hygiene, logistics, recyclability, reuse system requirements, labelling, EPR reporting, and cost.
Technical Documentation for Restricted Packaging Formats
Restricted packaging format compliance should be documented. Companies may need to prove that a packaging format is not in scope, that an exemption applies, or that the packaging has been replaced.
The workshop’s technical documentation section explains that companies should maintain packaging descriptions, design and manufacturing details, relevant standards or specifications, evidence of recyclability assessments, and a Declaration of Conformity. It also identifies violations of packaging restrictions as a formal non-compliance risk.
Documentation checklist
|
Documentation Item |
Why It Matters |
|
Packaging description |
Identifies the packaging format and use |
|
Material composition |
Shows whether plastic, composite, or other materials are involved |
|
Use case assessment |
Confirms whether packaging is retail, HORECA, hotel, fresh produce, or carrier bag packaging |
|
Single-use assessment |
Shows whether packaging is single-use or reusable |
|
Product category |
Helps determine whether Annex V applies |
|
Weight and size evidence |
Relevant for fresh produce and hotel miniature thresholds |
|
Exemption evidence |
Supports food safety, hygiene, physical protection, or micro-company exemptions |
|
Alternative assessment |
Shows that compliant alternatives were reviewed |
|
Supplier documentation |
Confirms material and format details |
|
Artwork and label records |
Supports packaging identification and communication |
|
Change management records |
Shows when restricted packaging was redesigned or removed |
A compliance file is especially important where a company continues using a packaging format that may appear restricted but is justified by an exemption or out-of-scope use case.
Packaging Restrictions and EPR Data
Restricted packaging formats also affect EPR and packaging reporting because companies need accurate data on packaging types, materials, weights, and markets.
The workshop identifies producer data categories such as packaging quantities by material and type, composite packaging data, reusable packaging data, annual plastic carrier bag data, deposit-return system data, and packaging placed on market.
Data to collect for restricted packaging formats
|
Data Category |
Examples |
|
Packaging format |
Grouped packaging, HORECA packaging, fresh produce packaging, hotel miniature, carrier bag |
|
Material type |
Plastic, paper, cardboard, composite, metal, glass, other |
|
Single-use or reusable status |
Determines restriction and alternative pathway |
|
Product category |
Food, beverage, cosmetics, hospitality, fresh produce, retail |
|
Weight and quantity |
Supports EPR reporting and restriction review |
|
Country placed on market |
National bans and systems may differ during transition |
|
Exemption basis |
Hygiene, food safety, physical protection, micro-company status |
|
Alternative format |
New packaging adopted or under assessment |
|
Supplier evidence |
Confirms material and packaging design |
|
Date of transition |
Helps manage phase-out and stock planning |
Packaging restrictions should be integrated into packaging data management, not handled only as a legal memo.
Common Mistakes Companies Should Avoid
Restricted packaging format risks often happen because companies focus only on material compliance or recyclability and forget packaging use cases.
Common mistakes
|
Mistake |
Why It Creates Risk |
|
Assuming recyclable packaging is always allowed |
A format may still be restricted even if recyclable |
|
Ignoring packaging use case |
Retail, HORECA, hotel, and fresh produce use cases matter |
|
Waiting until 2030 |
Redesign, supplier qualification, and stock planning take time |
|
Treating all grouped packaging the same |
Distribution handling may be different from retail convenience grouping |
|
Using condiment sachets by default |
On-premises HORECA use may be restricted |
|
Keeping hotel miniatures without a transition plan |
Hospitality formats may need replacement |
|
Not documenting fresh produce exemptions |
Food safety or quality justifications should be evidenced |
|
Confusing compostable with allowed |
Compostability does not automatically remove restriction risk |
|
Not checking national bans |
Some Member States may already have restrictions |
|
Ignoring composite packaging |
Partial plastic content may still create obligations |
A strong packaging restriction review should combine legal assessment, packaging data, product use context, supplier evidence, and technical documentation.
Practical Restricted Packaging Readiness Roadmap
Companies can use the following roadmap to prepare for restricted packaging formats under PPWR.
Step 1: Build a packaging format inventory
List all packaging formats used across products, business units, suppliers, retail channels, HORECA operations, hospitality services, and markets.
Step 2: Identify single-use packaging
Classify whether each packaging format is single-use, reusable, refillable, grouped, transport, service, sales, HORECA, fresh produce, hotel, or carrier bag packaging.
Step 3: Map packaging to Annex V categories
Compare each packaging format against restricted categories such as single-use plastic grouped packaging, fresh produce packaging, HORECA packaging, condiment packaging, hotel miniatures, and very lightweight plastic carrier bags.
Step 4: Assess material composition
Identify whether the packaging is plastic, composite, partially plastic, paper-based, compostable, reusable, or another material.
Step 5: Review use case and location
Determine whether the packaging is used at retail level, for distribution handling, for HORECA on-premises consumption, for take-away, for hotel accommodation, or for fresh produce.
Step 6: Identify exemptions or justifications
Assess whether exemptions may apply, such as hygiene, food waste prevention, microbiological hazard avoidance, physical shock protection, or micro-company status.
Step 7: Prioritize high-risk packaging
Prioritize packaging that is high-volume, customer-facing, used in multiple EU markets, difficult to replace, or likely to be restricted from 2030.
Step 8: Develop alternative packaging plans
Evaluate reusable, refillable, unpackaged, paper-based, right-sized, or other compliant packaging alternatives.
Step 9: Update supplier and procurement requirements
Communicate future restricted-format rules to suppliers and require compliant alternatives and supporting documentation.
Step 10: Maintain technical documentation
Keep evidence showing packaging classification, exemption basis, replacement plan, supplier declarations, material composition, and conformity assessment.
How ComplyMarket Supports Restricted Packaging Format Compliance
Restricted packaging format compliance under PPWR requires structured packaging data, product mapping, supplier evidence, material classification, use-case assessment, country tracking, technical documentation, and transition planning.
ComplyMarket’s packaging compliance services describe packaging compliance as a market-access topic that may include packaging materials, labelling, recycling, waste management, documentation, registration, reporting, and EPR obligations. ComplyMarket also highlights the value of managing regulations, documentation, supplier compliance, and Digital Product Passport requirements within the ComplyMarket portal.
ComplyMarket can help companies prepare for restricted packaging format requirements by supporting:
- Packaging format inventory management
- Product-to-packaging and market mapping
- Identification of restricted or high-risk packaging formats
- Packaging material and component data management
- Supplier declaration and documentation collection
- Exemption and justification evidence tracking
- Alternative packaging transition records
- Technical documentation and Declaration of Conformity support
- Country-specific packaging requirement monitoring
- EPR and packaging reporting data preparation
- Version control for packaging redesigns and supplier changes
- Audit-ready records for internal and external compliance reviews
- Digital Product Passport and circular economy data readiness
The attached workshop identifies ComplyMarket capabilities across product compliance management software, sustainability reporting software, material compliance software, packaging compliance, Extended Producer Responsibility services, Digital Product Passport, and global market access.
For companies preparing for PPWR packaging restrictions, the challenge is not only knowing which formats are restricted. The real challenge is identifying every affected packaging format across the product portfolio, proving whether exemptions apply, replacing restricted packaging before deadlines, and keeping records updated across suppliers, markets, and business units.
ComplyMarket helps companies move from scattered packaging lists, supplier emails, and manual risk reviews to a structured, traceable, and audit-ready packaging compliance process.
Comments
Leave a comment or ask a question
No comments yet.