EU Packaging EPR Compliance Guide Under PPWR 2026

Packaging Extended Producer Responsibility, commonly known as packaging EPR, is one of the most important compliance obligations for companies placing packaged products on the EU market.

Under EPR, producers are responsible for the packaging they make available on the market, including registration, reporting, financing, waste management obligations, and in some cases participation in producer responsibility organizations. For businesses, packaging EPR is no longer only a waste-management topic. It is now connected to market access, online sales, packaging data, recyclability, recycled content, deposit-return systems, technical documentation, and financial planning.

Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste entered into force on 11 February 2025 and will generally apply from 12 August 2026. The European Commission states that the PPWR covers all packaging and packaging waste, regardless of material or origin, and sets requirements for manufacturing, composition, reusable or recoverable nature, packaging waste management, and waste prevention.

The regulation is also designed to reduce unnecessary packaging waste, make packaging more recyclable, increase recycled plastic use, encourage reuse and refill, and make producers pay for environmentally harmful or non-recyclable materials.

The attached packaging compliance workshop identifies packaging EPR as a dedicated compliance area. It covers producer registration, annual reporting, appointed representatives, producer responsibility organizations, information required for registration, online platform obligations, seller obligations, data reporting, deposit-return system data, communication to end users, and formal non-compliance risks.

For manufacturers, importers, distributors, retailers, online marketplaces, e-commerce sellers, packaging suppliers, and brand owners, the key message is clear: packaging EPR compliance depends on accurate data, country-level registration, reliable reporting, and audit-ready evidence.

What Is Packaging EPR?

Packaging EPR means Extended Producer Responsibility for packaging. It is a regulatory approach where producers are responsible for the packaging they place on the market, especially after that packaging becomes waste.

In practice, packaging EPR may require companies to:

Register as a producer in national packaging registers
Report packaging placed on the market
Classify packaging by material, weight, type, and country
Pay EPR fees or financial contributions
Join a producer responsibility organization where required
Appoint an EPR representative in certain Member States
Provide packaging data to authorities or compliance schemes
Provide registration numbers to online platforms
Support collection, sorting, recycling, reuse, or recovery systems
Communicate information to end users
Keep evidence and records for audits or authority requests

EPR is important because packaging waste management costs are increasingly being shifted to producers. The European Commission explains that packaging waste is growing, packaging uses large quantities of primary raw materials, and low levels of reuse, collection, and recycling are a barrier to a circular and resilient economy.

For businesses, EPR turns packaging from a design and logistics topic into a recurring compliance and reporting obligation.

Why Packaging EPR Matters Under PPWR

Packaging EPR matters under PPWR because producer responsibility is directly connected to whether packaging can legally be placed on the market.

The workshop states that producers must register in each Member State where they make packaging available on the market for the first time and that producers must not make packaging available in a Member State if they, or their appointed representatives where applicable, are not registered there.

This means EPR is not only a reporting task at the end of the year. It can affect product availability, online listings, retailer acceptance, and market entry.

Packaging EPR can affect:

Business Area	Practical Impact
Market access	Packaging may not be sold if producer registration is missing
E-commerce	Online platforms may request registration numbers and self-certification
Retail	Retailers may require proof of EPR registration before listing products
Finance	EPR fees can affect product cost and margin
Procurement	Supplier data is needed for packaging weight and material reporting
Packaging design	Recyclability and recycled content may influence future fees
Sustainability	EPR data supports circular economy reporting
Legal and compliance	Companies need country-specific registration and evidence
Operations	Packaging changes must be reflected in data and reporting
Management reporting	EPR creates ongoing compliance and financial exposure

ComplyMarket’s packaging compliance information also describes packaging compliance as covering labelling, material composition, recycling obligations, registration, notification, reporting, documentation, recordkeeping, recyclability, eco-design expectations, and EPR compliance.

Who Is a Producer for Packaging EPR?

The producer is generally the economic operator that makes packaging available on the market for the first time in a Member State. However, determining the producer can be complex because packaging supply chains include manufacturers, fillers, importers, distributors, retailers, brand owners, private-label sellers, and online sellers.

The workshop explains that producers of packaging have EPR obligations for packaging they make available on the market for the first time within the territory of a Member State. It also gives examples showing that the responsible producer may vary depending on who manufactures the packaging, who fills it, whose brand appears on it, and where it is placed on the market.

Businesses that may be producers

Business Type	Why It May Have EPR Obligations
Packaging manufacturer	May place empty packaging on the market
Product manufacturer	May place packaged products on the market
Brand owner	May control branded packaging and product placement
Importer	May place packaged products from outside the EU on the market
Retailer	May place private-label or service packaging on the market
Online seller	May sell packaged goods directly into Member States
Distributor	May be responsible depending on supply chain structure
Filler or packer	May place filled packaging on the market
Marketplace seller	May need registration numbers and self-certification

Companies should not assume that the packaging supplier is always responsible. Producer responsibility depends on the supply chain role, market, packaging type, and who first makes the packaging available in the Member State.

Producer Registration: The First EPR Step

Producer registration is one of the most important EPR obligations.

The workshop states that producers must submit an application for registration in each Member State where they make packaging available on the market for the first time. It also states that producers must register before placing packaging on that market and that obligations may be fulfilled by a producer responsibility organization or an appointed representative where applicable.

Producer registration checklist

Registration Item	Why It Matters
Producer name	Identifies the legally responsible entity
Brand names	Helps authorities link products and packaging to the producer
Postal address	Supports official communication
Contact details	Allows communication with competent authorities
Trade register number	Confirms legal identity
Tax identification number	Supports financial identification
Member State register	Registration must be handled country by country
Packaging types	Supports reporting and fee calculations
Packaging materials	Plastic, paper, glass, metal, wood, composite, and other materials
Packaging quantities	Weight and volume data may be required
PRO details	Needed where a producer responsibility organization is used
Appointed representative details	Needed where the producer is not established in that Member State
Self-certification	May be requested by marketplaces or platforms

Registration should be completed before products are placed on the market. Waiting until the first annual reporting period can create legal and commercial risk.

No Registration, No Market Access

One of the clearest EPR risks is selling without registration.

The workshop states that producers shall not make packaging available on the market if they, or where applicable their appointed representatives, are not registered in that Member State.

For companies, this creates a direct market access requirement.

Practical examples

Scenario	EPR Risk
Non-EU company sells packaged goods into several EU countries	May need registration or appointed representatives in each relevant Member State
Online seller lists products on a marketplace	Marketplace may request registration number and self-certification
Retailer launches private-label products	Retailer may be producer for private-label packaging
Importer brings packaged goods into EU	Importer may carry responsibility for packaging placed on market
Distributor sells into another Member State	Producer responsibility must be checked for that market
Brand owner changes packaging supplier	Registration data and reporting records may need updating

A company should treat EPR registration as part of market launch approval. Products should not be released to a new EU market until packaging EPR responsibility has been assessed.

Appointed Representatives for EPR

Appointed representatives are important for companies selling into Member States where they are not established.

The workshop states that a producer must appoint, by written mandate, an appointed representative for EPR in each Member State other than the Member State where it is established if it makes packaging available there for the first time. The mandate must be in writing.

Appointed representative checklist

Requirement	Practical Meaning
Written mandate	The representative must be formally appointed
Member State coverage	Appointment may be needed per relevant Member State
Registration support	Representative may handle producer register obligations
Reporting support	Representative may submit data or support reporting
Communication with authorities	Representative may act as contact point
Recordkeeping	Documents should be stored and updated
Change management	Mandates must be updated if markets or roles change

Non-EU businesses and EU businesses selling across borders should map where they are established, where they place packaging on the market, and where appointed representatives may be needed.

Producer Responsibility Organizations

A producer responsibility organization, commonly called a PRO, can help producers fulfil EPR obligations.

The workshop states that producers may entrust a producer responsibility organization authorized to carry out EPR obligations on their behalf. It also notes that Member States may adopt measures to make PRO entrustment mandatory and that even when using a PRO, the producer retains ultimate responsibility to ensure compliance.

What a PRO may support

PRO Role	Practical Benefit
Registration support	Helps producers register in a national system
Data reporting	Supports packaging data submission
Fee calculation	Calculates EPR fees based on material and quantity
Waste management financing	Supports collection, sorting, recycling, and recovery systems
Compliance documentation	Provides evidence of participation
Communication with authorities	Supports regulatory interaction
Public information campaigns	May support required consumer communication
Scheme management	Helps producers participate in national EPR systems

Companies should not treat PRO membership as a full replacement for internal compliance. Producers still need reliable packaging data, supplier evidence, accurate material classification, and internal controls.

Individual Fulfilment of EPR Obligations

Some producers may fulfil EPR obligations individually instead of through a PRO, depending on the Member State rules and authorization process.

The workshop states that a producer fulfilling EPR individually must apply for authorization from the competent authority. The producer must show that measures are sufficient for return or collection of packaging waste, that necessary sorting and recycling capacity is available, and that an adequate financial guarantee is provided to cover costs in case of non-compliance or insolvency.

Individual fulfilment may require evidence of:

Evidence Area	Why It Matters
Collection system	Shows packaging waste can be collected
Return arrangements	Supports consumer or business take-back
Sorting capacity	Shows waste can enter the correct stream
Recycling capacity	Shows material can be processed
Financial guarantee	Protects against non-compliance or insolvency
Reporting system	Supports data submission
Consumer communication	Supports end-user participation
Authority authorization	Confirms legal acceptance of individual fulfilment

For many companies, a PRO may be more practical. However, companies with closed-loop systems, specialized packaging, or large volumes may need to evaluate individual fulfilment carefully.

Annual Reporting Requirements

EPR compliance requires recurring reporting. It is not a one-time registration exercise.

The workshop states that producers, or appointed representatives where applicable, must report to the competent authority responsible for the register by 1 March each year for the preceding calendar year, using the information set out in Annex IX Part B. It notes that reporting must include data such as packaging volumes, waste collected, and recycling details.

Annual reporting may include:

Reporting Category	Examples
Producer identification	Name, address, brand names, contact details
National identification codes	Trade register number, tax identification number
Packaging placed on market	Quantities by material, type, and weight
Packaging type	Sales, grouped, transport, e-commerce, service packaging
Material type	Plastic, glass, paper/cardboard, metal, wood, composite
Reusable packaging data	Quantities placed on market, reuse rates, packaging in circulation
Separately collected waste	Waste collected by material type
Recycling and recovery data	Recycled, recovered, and disposed quantities
Deposit-return data	Deposit-bearing packaging placed and collected
Composite packaging data	Material breakdown by weight
Exported waste	Evidence that treatment meets equivalent environmental standards where relevant
Recycled material use	Recycled material used in new packaging
Plastic carrier bag data	Consumption data by bag category where relevant

The workshop also states that data granularity may be greater unless the producer places less than 10 tonnes on the market.

A strong packaging EPR process should collect data continuously throughout the year, not only before the reporting deadline.

Updating Registration Information

Registration data must remain current.

The workshop states that producers must notify the competent authority without undue delay of any changes to registration information and of any permanent cessation of making packaging available on the market. It also states that a producer may be excluded from the register if the producer has ceased to exist.

Changes that may require updates

Change	Why It Matters
Company name or address	Register information must stay accurate
Brand names	Authorities and marketplaces may link brands to producer records
Contact details	Authorities need reliable communication channels
Legal entity changes	Responsibility may shift after restructuring
PRO changes	Scheme participation details may need updating
Appointed representative changes	Mandate details must stay current
Packaging material changes	Reporting and fee calculation may change
Packaging volume changes	Reporting and fees may change
Market withdrawal	Register should reflect cessation of activity
New Member State sales	Additional registration may be needed

EPR compliance requires ongoing maintenance. A company that registers once and never updates its data may still become non-compliant.

Packaging Data Producers Must Collect

Packaging EPR is fundamentally a data-management obligation. Producers need accurate, reliable, and detailed packaging information.

The workshop identifies several categories of information that producers must provide, including producer identification, national identification codes, packaging quantities, producer responsibility statements, EPR scheme details, PRO mandates, recycling and recovery data, deposit-return data, additional compliance details, environmental reporting, packaging composition, reusable packaging data, and changes to information.

Core packaging EPR data checklist

Data Category	Practical Examples
Producer identification	Name, brand names, address, email, phone
National identification	Trade register number, tax ID
Packaging quantities	Weight by packaging material and packaging type
Packaging materials	Glass, plastic, paper/cardboard, metal, wood, other
Packaging type	Sales, grouped, transport, e-commerce, reusable
Market placed on	Member State where packaging is made available
PRO information	Name, contact details, identification details
PRO mandate	Formal statement confirming representation
Appointed representative	Written mandate and representative details
Recycling data	Waste collected, recycled, recovered, disposed
DRS data	Deposit-bearing packaging placed and collected
Composite packaging data	Material breakdown by weight
Reusable packaging data	Quantities placed, reuse rates, circulation data
Plastic carrier bag data	Bag categories, weight, number placed
Environmental data	Recycled content or lifecycle data where applicable
Registration changes	Updates to brand, address, volumes, cessation

EPR data should be linked to products, SKUs, packaging components, suppliers, countries, and reporting periods.

Packaging Composition and Material Classification

Correct packaging classification is essential for EPR reporting and fee calculation.

The workshop explains that packaging quantities should be reported by weight for each type of packaging placed on the market, such as glass, plastic, paper/cardboard, metal, and wood. It also notes that composite packaging material breakdown should be reported by weight where a material is more than 5% of total mass.

Material classification questions

Question	Why It Matters
Is the packaging plastic, paper, cardboard, glass, metal, wood, or composite?	Material type affects reporting and fees
Is the packaging sales, grouped, transport, or e-commerce packaging?	Packaging type may affect reporting structure
What is the weight of each component?	Weight is central to EPR reporting
Does the packaging contain multiple materials?	Composite packaging may need material breakdown
Are labels, inks, coatings, closures, and adhesives included?	Components can affect classification and evidence
Is the packaging reusable?	Reusable packaging data may need separate reporting
Is the packaging deposit-bearing?	DRS data may be required
Is packaging exported or imported?	Market placement calculations may change

Companies should avoid using estimated or outdated packaging weights. EPR reporting should be based on reliable packaging specifications and supplier evidence.

EPR Fees and Eco-Modulation

EPR fees are financial contributions paid by producers to support the management of packaging waste. These fees may depend on packaging material, weight, recyclability, recycled content, and national scheme rules.

The European Commission explains that brands using non-recyclable or environmentally harmful materials will have to pay to clean them up, while the new rules are designed to encourage more recyclable and less wasteful packaging.

The workshop also links packaging recyclability and recycled content to financial contributions. It notes that EPR fees may be modulated based on recyclability performance grade and that producers’ financial contributions under EPR schemes may depend on recycled content in packaging.

Factors that may affect EPR costs

Factor	Why It Matters
Packaging material	Different materials may have different fees
Packaging weight	Heavier packaging usually increases reporting quantities
Recyclability	Easier-to-recycle packaging may have better fee treatment
Recycled content	Recycled content may influence financial contributions
Reuse	Reusable packaging may be treated differently in some systems
Country	Fees and reporting structures vary by Member State
PRO	Scheme rules may differ
Packaging format	Sales, grouped, transport, and service packaging may be treated differently

EPR should therefore be part of packaging design and cost planning. A packaging redesign that improves recyclability or reduces weight may reduce long-term compliance cost.

EPR and Online Marketplace Obligations

Online marketplaces are increasingly part of packaging EPR compliance.

The workshop states that online platforms should verify producer registration, obtain registration numbers, require self-certification that EPR requirements are met, provide links to national producer registers, cooperate with authorities, and prevent non-registered producers from selling on the platform.

What online platforms may request

Marketplace Requirement	What Sellers Should Prepare
Producer registration number	Proof of registration in the relevant Member State
Self-certification	Confirmation that EPR obligations are met
Packaging material data	Supports reporting and compliance checks
PRO participation evidence	Shows participation in a compliance scheme
Appointed representative details	Needed where applicable
Product packaging compliance evidence	Supports recyclability, minimization, labelling, and other requirements
Reporting records	Shows ongoing compliance
Country mapping	Shows where packaging is placed on market

For sellers, missing EPR information can become a commercial problem. Even if the product itself is compliant, a marketplace may restrict the listing if EPR evidence is missing.

Seller Obligations on Online Platforms

Sellers using online platforms also have direct responsibilities.

The workshop explains that sellers should register with the national packaging producer register in each Member State where their products are sold for the first time, share registration numbers with the online platform, comply with EPR requirements including reporting and financial contributions, provide self-certification, ensure product packaging compliance, and provide accurate and reliable data to authorities.

Seller readiness checklist

Action	Why It Matters
Identify markets where products are sold	Registration may be required per Member State
Determine producer role	Confirms who is responsible
Register where required	Prevents market access issues
Join a PRO where needed	Supports compliance obligations
Appoint representative where required	Needed for cross-border EPR compliance
Prepare self-certification	Required by some platforms
Maintain packaging data	Needed for reporting and fee calculation
Store evidence	Supports audits and platform checks
Update registration details	Keeps data current
Monitor marketplace requirements	Platform rules may evolve

E-commerce teams should work with regulatory, packaging, finance, and legal teams before launching products into new EU markets.

Communication to End Users

Packaging EPR also includes communication responsibilities.

The workshop states that producers should make information available to end users, especially consumers, about the role of end users in waste prevention, reuse arrangements, separate collection, meaning of labels, environmental impact of inappropriate discarding, and composting properties. It notes that this information should be up to date, understandable, and provided through channels such as websites, public information, education campaigns, or signage.

End-user communication topics

Topic	Practical Purpose
Waste prevention	Encourages reduced packaging waste
Reuse arrangements	Explains how reusable packaging should be returned or reused
Separate collection	Helps consumers sort packaging correctly
Meaning of labels	Reduces sorting confusion
Inappropriate discarding	Explains environmental impact
Composting properties	Supports correct disposal of compostable packaging
DRS participation	Explains deposit and return procedures
Collection points	Helps consumers return packaging where relevant

End-user communication should be aligned with packaging labels, QR codes, country-specific instructions, and waste collection systems.

EPR and Deposit-Return Systems

Deposit and Return Systems, known as DRS, are connected to packaging EPR because they help finance and organize the return and collection of certain packaging.

The workshop states that by 1 January 2029, Member States must ensure DRS setup for single-use plastic beverage bottles up to 3 liters and single-use metal beverage containers up to 3 liters. It also states that producers should cooperate with deposit-return systems and comply with deposit labelling, deposit fees, redemption protocols, and related requirements where applicable.

DRS data that may be needed

Data Category	Examples
Deposit-bearing packaging placed on market	Number and weight of covered beverage containers
Material type	Plastic, metal, glass where applicable
Deposit value	Financial amount paid by consumer
Packaging collected	Returned and collected quantities
Deposit refunds	Number or value of refunds issued
Return point information	Locations and accessibility
Labelling evidence	DRS label or barcode information
System participation	Membership or participation records

The workshop identifies minimum DRS requirements such as fair access, data collection, minimum deposit levels, financial capacity, transparency, public awareness campaigns, deposit refunds, consumer convenience, clear labelling, return point accessibility, and interoperability in cross-border regions.

Country-Specific EPR Complexity

Packaging EPR is not identical across all markets. Even under PPWR, companies still need to manage national registers, competent authorities, PROs, reporting formats, fees, deadlines, labels, and national implementation requirements.

The European Commission’s packaging waste page points businesses to implementation support, including information on national competent authorities, guidelines, and FAQs for PPWR implementation.

The attached workshop shows country-level EPR complexity across multiple markets, including the United Kingdom, Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Ireland, Italy, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Portugal, Romania, and many other jurisdictions. It also includes examples of country-specific registration, labelling, reporting, compliance schemes, plastic taxes, deposit systems, and producer obligations.

Country-level variables companies should track

Variable	Why It Matters
Producer register	Registration process differs by Member State
Competent authority	Reporting and enforcement authority may differ
PRO or compliance scheme	Participation requirements and options vary
Appointed representative	May be required for foreign producers
Reporting deadline	Dates and submission formats vary
Fee structure	EPR fees differ by country and material
Packaging categories	National classification may differ
Label requirements	Local labels may still apply
Deposit-return systems	DRS scope and operation vary
Plastic bag rules	Bag restrictions and reporting differ
Data format	Reporting templates and portals differ
Audit requirements	Evidence requests may vary

A company selling in several EU countries needs a jurisdiction-level EPR process, not one generic packaging spreadsheet.

Common Packaging EPR Mistakes to Avoid

Packaging EPR mistakes often happen because companies underestimate the data, country mapping, and ownership required.

Common mistakes

Mistake	Why It Creates Risk
Assuming one EU registration covers all markets	Registration is generally managed Member State by Member State
Not identifying the responsible producer	Responsibility may depend on supply chain role
Selling before registration	May create market access and enforcement risk
Missing appointed representatives	Cross-border EPR obligations may be incomplete
Treating PRO membership as complete compliance	Producers still need accurate data and oversight
Reporting estimated packaging weights	EPR fees and reports may be inaccurate
Ignoring packaging components	Labels, closures, inserts, and coatings may affect material data
Not updating registration details	Authority records may become inaccurate
Forgetting online marketplace requirements	Listings may be blocked or restricted
Managing EPR only once per year	Data should be maintained continuously

The workshop also identifies formal non-compliance risks, including missing or false information, administrative issues, technical documentation problems, and non-compliance with packaging-related requirements.

Practical Packaging EPR Readiness Roadmap

Companies can use the following roadmap to prepare for packaging EPR obligations under PPWR.

Step 1: Build a packaging inventory

List all packaging used across products, suppliers, packaging levels, and markets. Include sales packaging, grouped packaging, transport packaging, e-commerce packaging, reusable packaging, service packaging, and packaging components.

Step 2: Identify where packaging is placed on the market

Map packaging to each Member State where the product is sold or made available for the first time.

Step 3: Determine producer responsibility

Identify which legal entity is the producer for each packaging scenario. Consider manufacturer, importer, retailer, brand owner, filler, distributor, online seller, and private-label roles.

Step 4: Register in national producer registers

Complete registration in each required Member State before placing packaging on the market.

Step 5: Appoint representatives where required

Where the producer is not established in the relevant Member State, appoint an EPR representative by written mandate where required.

Step 6: Select PRO or individual fulfilment route

Decide whether to comply through a PRO or individual fulfilment, depending on Member State rules and business model.

Step 7: Collect packaging data

Collect material type, packaging type, weight, quantity, country, brand, product mapping, reusable packaging data, and DRS data.

Step 8: Prepare annual reporting

Set up an internal reporting calendar and prepare submissions before national deadlines, including the 1 March annual reporting point identified in the workshop.

Step 9: Prepare marketplace evidence

Store registration numbers, self-certifications, PRO evidence, appointed representative details, and packaging data for online platform checks.

Step 10: Monitor changes

Update registration details, packaging data, supplier information, material classifications, volumes, and markets whenever changes occur.

Packaging EPR Compliance Checklist

Question	Status
Have all packaging formats been identified?	To be checked
Is each packaging item linked to products and markets?	To be checked
Is the responsible producer identified for each market?	To be checked
Are national producer registrations completed?	To be checked
Are registration numbers stored and accessible?	To be checked
Are appointed representatives required and appointed?	To be checked
Is PRO participation required or selected?	To be checked
Is individual fulfilment authorization needed?	To be checked
Are packaging materials classified correctly?	To be checked
Are packaging weights verified?	To be checked
Is composite packaging breakdown available?	To be checked
Is reusable packaging data tracked?	To be checked
Is DRS data tracked where relevant?	To be checked
Are marketplace self-certifications prepared?	To be checked
Are annual reporting deadlines monitored?	To be checked
Are changes to registration information updated promptly?	To be checked
Are records audit-ready?	To be checked

This checklist can support supplier onboarding, product launch reviews, marketplace readiness, EPR reporting, internal audits, and annual compliance planning.

How ComplyMarket Supports Packaging EPR Compliance

Packaging EPR compliance under PPWR requires accurate data, jurisdiction-level obligation tracking, producer registration records, supplier evidence, reporting workflows, PRO documentation, appointed representative management, and audit-ready evidence.

ComplyMarket’s packaging compliance services describe packaging compliance as a market-access topic covering primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging, material composition, labelling, recycling obligations, registration, reporting, documentation, recordkeeping, recyclability, eco-design, and EPR compliance.

ComplyMarket’s EPR management service also describes EPR management as requiring regulatory intelligence, applicability control, data collection, reporting, evidence management, and jurisdiction-level management because EPR is not one single law but a combination of framework rules and stream-specific obligations.

ComplyMarket can help companies prepare for packaging EPR requirements by supporting:

Packaging inventory and packaging BoM management
Product-to-packaging and country mapping
Identification of producer responsibility by market
National packaging EPR obligation tracking
Producer registration record management
Appointed representative and PRO evidence management
Packaging material, weight, and component data management
Supplier declaration and packaging specification collection
Annual EPR reporting data preparation
DRS and reusable packaging data tracking
Online marketplace registration evidence and self-certification support
Version control for packaging, supplier, and market changes
Audit-ready records for internal and external compliance reviews
Digital Product Passport and circular economy data readiness

The attached workshop identifies ComplyMarket capabilities across product compliance management software, sustainability reporting software, material compliance software, packaging compliance, Extended Producer Responsibility services, Digital Product Passport, authorized representative services, and global market access.

For companies selling packaged products across multiple EU markets, the challenge is not only knowing that packaging EPR applies. The real challenge is proving registration, reporting accurately, managing country-specific obligations, responding to platform and authority requests, and keeping packaging data updated as products, suppliers, and markets change.

ComplyMarket helps companies move from fragmented spreadsheets, supplier emails, national portals, and manual reporting workflows to a structured, traceable, and audit-ready packaging EPR compliance process.