Compostable Packaging Requirements Under PPWR 2026
Compostable packaging is becoming an important but often misunderstood topic under the EU Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, known as the PPWR. Many companies assume that compostable or biodegradable packaging is automatically better than conventional packaging. Under the PPWR, the reality is more specific.
Compostability is not treated as a universal replacement for recyclability. In many cases, packaging should still be designed for material recycling. Compostable packaging is mainly relevant where compostability brings a practical environmental benefit, supports organic waste collection, and does not disrupt other recycling systems.
Regulation (EU) 2025/40 on packaging and packaging waste entered into force on 11 February 2025 and will generally apply from 12 August 2026. The European Commission explains that the PPWR covers all packaging and packaging waste, regardless of material or origin, and sets requirements for packaging manufacturing, composition, reusable or recoverable nature, waste management, and waste prevention.
The attached packaging compliance workshop identifies compostable packaging as a dedicated PPWR compliance area. It covers mandatory compostability for certain packaging types, requirements for lightweight plastic bags, the rule that other packaging materials must prioritize recycling, proof of compliance, possible future additions to the compostable packaging list, and technical standards such as EN 13432:2000.
For manufacturers, importers, packaging suppliers, retailers, food and beverage companies, cosmetics companies, e-commerce sellers, and compliance teams, the main message is clear: compostable packaging must be assessed, documented, labelled, and justified carefully.
What Is Compostable Packaging?
Compostable packaging is packaging designed to break down under composting conditions into natural components such as carbon dioxide, water, and biomass, without leaving harmful residues or disrupting the composting process.
However, “compostable” does not always mean the same thing in practice. Companies need to distinguish between:
|
Term |
Practical Meaning |
|
Industrially compostable |
Packaging is designed to break down under controlled industrial composting conditions |
|
Home compostable |
Packaging is designed to break down under home composting conditions, which are usually less controlled |
|
Biodegradable |
A broader term meaning the material can break down biologically under certain conditions |
|
Biobased |
Material made fully or partly from biological feedstock, but not automatically compostable or biodegradable |
|
Recyclable |
Packaging can be collected, sorted, and reprocessed into secondary raw materials |
This distinction is important because a package can be biobased but not compostable. It can be compostable but not home compostable. It can be biodegradable under specific test conditions but not suitable for normal consumer disposal. It can also be compostable but still not the right choice if it contaminates recycling streams.
Under PPWR, compostable packaging should be treated as a specific compliance route, not a general sustainability label.
Which Packaging Must Be Compostable Under PPWR?
The workshop explains that within 24 months after the regulation takes effect, certain packaging types must be compostable in industrial facilities. These include tea bags, single-serve coffee pods or capsules, sticky labels attached to fruit and vegetables, and very lightweight plastic bags such as those used for produce.
Packaging Types Identified for Mandatory Compostability
|
Packaging Type |
Why It Matters |
|
Tea bags |
Often disposed of together with tea leaves and organic waste |
|
Single-serve coffee pods or capsules |
May be disposed of with coffee residue |
|
Coffee, tea, or beverage system single-serve units |
Relevant where packaging and product residue are discarded together |
|
Sticky labels attached to fruit and vegetables |
Labels may enter organic waste streams with peels or spoiled produce |
|
Very lightweight plastic bags |
Often used for loose produce and may be connected to hygiene or food waste prevention |
The PPWR’s official guidance also confirms that the definition of packaging includes permeable tea, coffee, or other beverage bags, soft after-use system single-serve units, and non-permeable tea, coffee, or beverage system single-serve units intended for machine use and disposed of together with the product.
The practical takeaway is that compostability is focused on packaging formats that are likely to enter organic waste streams together with product residue or food waste.
Compostability Is Not the Default for All Packaging
One of the most important PPWR messages is that compostable packaging should not automatically replace recyclable packaging.
The workshop states that starting 24 months after the regulation takes effect, any other packaging, including biodegradable plastics, must allow material recycling and must not disrupt the recycling of other waste materials. Manufacturers must provide technical documentation to demonstrate that packaging meets compostability or recyclability requirements.
This means companies should not assume that switching to compostable plastic is always compliant or preferred. For most packaging, the first question should be:
Can this packaging be designed for material recycling?
Only after that should the company assess whether compostability is required, justified, or allowed.
When recycling may remain the priority
|
Packaging Situation |
Why Recycling May Be Preferred |
|
Packaging is not normally contaminated with food residue |
Material recycling may provide better circularity |
|
Packaging is made from widely recycled material |
Composting could remove valuable material from recycling streams |
|
Composting infrastructure is limited |
Consumers may not have access to the right disposal route |
|
Packaging could contaminate recycling |
Compostable plastics may disrupt conventional recycling |
|
Packaging is used in e-commerce or transport |
Compostability may not provide a practical end-of-life benefit |
|
Packaging carries vague sustainability claims |
Risk of misleading consumers |
The business risk is using compostability as a marketing solution instead of a compliance-based design decision.
Industrial Compostability vs Home Compostability
Companies should clearly distinguish between industrial compostability and home compostability.
Industrial compostability means the packaging is designed to break down in controlled industrial composting facilities. These facilities can manage temperature, humidity, oxygen, microbial activity, and processing time.
Home compostability is more difficult because home composting conditions vary widely. Temperature, moisture, turning frequency, and microbial activity are not standardized in the same way.
The PPWR guidance and related coverage indicate that home compostability may be considered only under specific local conditions and under the supervision of relevant authorities. Existing EN 13432 on industrial composting can be used as guidance until new harmonized standards are adopted.
Practical comparison
|
Compostability Type |
Practical Meaning |
Business Risk |
|
Industrial compostable |
Designed for controlled composting facilities |
Risk if consumers do not have access to industrial composting |
|
Home compostable |
Designed for home composting conditions |
Higher evidence burden due to variable conditions |
|
Biodegradable |
Breaks down under certain conditions |
Risk of vague or misleading claims |
|
Compostable in one market |
Accepted in a specific national system |
May not be accepted in another market |
Companies should avoid using “compostable” claims without specifying the conditions and evidence behind the claim.
Lightweight and Very Lightweight Plastic Bags
Plastic carrier bags are a specific PPWR topic. Very lightweight plastic carrier bags are particularly important because they are often used for loose food, hygiene purposes, or to prevent food waste.
The EUR-Lex summary explains that very lightweight bags are banned unless used for hygiene or to prevent food waste, and that Member States may decide whether such very lightweight bags must be compostable in their territories.
The workshop also explains that if a country has proper systems to collect and treat compostable packaging as organic waste, that country can require lightweight plastic bags to be biodegradable and compostable in industrial conditions.
Practical implications for businesses
|
Business Question |
Why It Matters |
|
Are very lightweight plastic bags used? |
They may be restricted or allowed only for specific purposes |
|
Are they used for hygiene or loose food? |
This can affect whether exceptions apply |
|
Does the Member State require compostability? |
National rules may differ |
|
Is industrial composting infrastructure available? |
Compostability depends on collection and treatment systems |
|
Is the bag labelled correctly? |
Consumers need clear disposal instructions |
|
Is evidence available? |
Suppliers must support compostability claims |
Retailers, grocery businesses, food producers, and produce suppliers should review plastic bag use by country, not only at EU level.
Packaging Types Where Compostability May Be High-Risk
Compostability can be useful for certain packaging, but it can be risky when used for the wrong products or in the wrong waste system.
Packaging types to review carefully
|
Packaging Type |
Risk |
|
Cosmetic sachets |
May not enter organic waste and could create misleading compostability claims |
|
E-commerce mailers |
Often not connected to organic waste streams |
|
Flexible films |
May be confused with recyclable plastic films |
|
Coated paper packaging |
Coating may affect compostability and recyclability |
|
Food-contact packaging |
Requires both safety and end-of-life assessment |
|
Multi-material packaging |
May not compost or recycle properly |
|
Beverage cups |
Infrastructure and residue issues vary by market |
|
Disposable cutlery or service items |
May fall under other single-use restrictions |
|
Biobased plastic packaging |
Biobased does not automatically mean compostable |
|
Packaging with adhesives or inks |
Additives may affect compostability evidence |
A compostable packaging decision should be based on a structured assessment, not only supplier marketing claims.
Technical Standards for Compostable Packaging
Technical standards are important because they help prove whether packaging is actually compostable.
The workshop references EN 13432:2000 as a standard to consider and notes that it will be updated.
The PPWR also recognizes the role of harmonized standards. Search results from the official regulation text and related regulatory summaries highlight that compostable packaging aligned with harmonized standards may benefit from a presumption of conformity.
What EN 13432 generally supports
|
Assessment Area |
Why It Matters |
|
Biodegradation |
Shows the material can biologically break down under composting conditions |
|
Disintegration |
Shows the material physically breaks down during composting |
|
Compost quality |
Ensures the resulting compost is not negatively affected |
|
Heavy metals and harmful substances |
Helps avoid contamination of compost |
|
Test conditions |
Provides controlled criteria for assessment |
Companies should monitor updates to relevant harmonized standards and avoid relying on outdated certificates or unsupported supplier statements.
Compostable Packaging and Technical Documentation
Compostable packaging must be supported by technical documentation. This is one of the most important compliance steps.
The workshop states that manufacturers must provide technical documentation, as outlined in Annex VII, to demonstrate that packaging meets compostability or recyclability requirements. It also states that other packaging, including biodegradable plastics, must allow material recycling and not disrupt the recycling of other waste materials.
Compostable packaging technical file checklist
|
Documentation Item |
What It Should Show |
|
Packaging description |
Packaging type, material, product use, and market |
|
Compostability reason |
Why compostability is required or justified |
|
Packaging category |
Tea bag, coffee pod, fruit label, very lightweight bag, or other |
|
Compostability type |
Industrial compostable or home compostable |
|
Standard or test method |
EN 13432 or other applicable standard/method |
|
Test report or certificate |
Evidence that packaging meets compostability requirements |
|
Material composition |
Polymers, paper, coatings, inks, adhesives, labels, additives |
|
Substance evidence |
Heavy metals, PFAS, and other relevant substance checks |
|
Sorting and disposal instructions |
How consumers should dispose of the packaging |
|
Recycling disruption assessment |
Evidence that the packaging does not disrupt other waste streams |
|
Supplier declaration |
Packaging supplier statement and supporting data |
|
Label evidence |
Artwork and claim evidence |
|
Declaration of Conformity |
Formal statement linked to technical file |
|
Version control |
Updates when material, supplier, design, or claim changes |
Technical documentation should be prepared before the packaging is placed on the market and updated when the packaging changes.
Compostable Packaging and Labelling
Labelling is essential for compostable packaging because consumers must understand how to dispose of it correctly.
The workshop explains that packaging may need an on-pack label indicating if a material is compostable, including whether it is home-compostable. It also states that labels and digital codes must be visible, clear, and permanent.
What compostable packaging labels should clarify
|
Label Information |
Why It Matters |
|
Whether packaging is compostable |
Helps consumers understand the correct disposal route |
|
Industrial or home compostable status |
Prevents confusion between different composting conditions |
|
Organic waste stream instructions |
Helps prevent contamination of other streams |
|
Local disposal instructions |
Composting infrastructure differs by market |
|
Certification or standard reference where appropriate |
Supports trust and evidence |
|
QR code or digital information where used |
Can provide more detailed disposal guidance |
|
Clear language and pictograms |
Improves consumer understanding |
Companies should avoid unclear wording such as “eco,” “green,” “earth-friendly,” or “biodegradable packaging” without specific, evidence-based explanations.
Compostability Claims and Greenwashing Risk
Compostability claims can create greenwashing risk when they are vague, exaggerated, or not supported by evidence.
A claim such as “compostable packaging” should be backed by evidence showing the compostability conditions, test method, standard, and disposal route. A claim such as “biodegradable” is even riskier if it does not explain where, how, and under what conditions the packaging biodegrades.
The workshop also highlights that misleading labels or symbols about sustainability or recyclability are not allowed and that environmental claims should be aligned with relevant criteria, methodologies, and calculation rules.
Claims that need evidence
|
Claim |
Evidence Needed |
|
Compostable |
Compostability test report or certification |
|
Industrially compostable |
Evidence under industrial composting conditions |
|
Home compostable |
Evidence under home composting conditions |
|
Biodegradable |
Conditions, timeframe, test method, and end-of-life context |
|
Biobased |
Biobased content evidence |
|
Plastic-free |
Material composition evidence |
|
Eco-friendly |
Specific measurable basis, not vague wording |
|
Sustainable packaging |
Clear criteria and evidence |
A practical rule: if the claim appears on packaging, websites, catalogues, product pages, or marketing material, the technical file should prove it.
Compostable Packaging vs Recyclable Packaging
Companies often ask whether packaging should be compostable or recyclable. Under PPWR, the answer depends on the packaging format, product use, disposal behavior, and waste infrastructure.
When compostability may be appropriate
|
Situation |
Why Compostability May Help |
|
Packaging is disposed of with organic residue |
Supports organic waste collection |
|
Packaging is difficult to separate from food waste |
Reduces contamination |
|
Packaging is one of the mandatory compostable formats |
Compliance requirement applies |
|
Local systems collect and treat compostable packaging |
End-of-life pathway exists |
|
Compostable design improves organic waste purity |
Reduces non-compostable contamination |
When recyclability may be more appropriate
|
Situation |
Why Recycling May Be Better |
|
Packaging is clean and material-recyclable |
Material recovery may provide higher circular value |
|
Packaging is not part of organic waste collection |
Composting route may not exist |
|
Packaging is made from valuable recyclable material |
Composting may remove material from recycling |
|
Compostable packaging could contaminate recycling streams |
Consumer confusion can harm recycling |
|
Local composting infrastructure is weak |
Claimed end-of-life route may not be realistic |
The workshop’s position is clear: other packaging materials, including biodegradable plastics, must prioritize material recycling and must not disrupt the recycling of other waste materials.
Member State Flexibility and National Rules
PPWR creates EU-level rules, but Member States may still have important roles in compostable packaging implementation.
The workshop states that if a country has proper systems to collect and treat compostable packaging as organic waste, the government can require lightweight plastic bags to be biodegradable and compostable in industrial conditions. It also explains that the Commission may expand the list of packaging types that must be compostable where certain criteria are met.
National factors companies should monitor
|
National Factor |
Why It Matters |
|
Organic waste collection system |
Determines whether compostable packaging has a practical route |
|
Industrial composting capacity |
Supports real compostability claims |
|
Home composting rules |
May vary by Member State |
|
Plastic bag rules |
Lightweight and very lightweight bag rules may differ |
|
Local labelling systems |
Sorting instructions may need country-specific wording |
|
EPR treatment |
Compostable packaging may be reported differently |
|
Compostability certification expectations |
Local schemes may recognize specific marks or standards |
Companies selling across the EU should not assume one compostable packaging label or claim works identically in every Member State.
Can the EU Add More Mandatory Compostable Packaging Types?
Yes, the list of packaging types requiring compostability may change in the future.
The workshop states that the European Commission can expand the list of packaging types that must be compostable, but only if it is technologically feasible and appropriate. For a packaging type to require compostability, it must meet criteria such as being unable to be reusable, being necessary for the product, being designed to enter the organic waste stream, being biodegradable under industrial composting conditions, improving organic waste collection, reducing contamination of compost, and not increasing contamination in non-compostable waste streams.
Criteria for possible future additions
|
Criterion |
Practical Meaning |
|
Cannot be reusable |
Reuse is not a practical option |
|
Product cannot exist without packaging |
Packaging is necessary |
|
Designed for organic waste stream |
Expected disposal route is organic waste |
|
Biodegradable under industrial composting |
Must break down under controlled composting conditions |
|
Improves organic waste collection |
Helps collect more or better organic waste |
|
Reduces contamination of compost |
Prevents non-compostable materials entering compost |
|
Does not contaminate other waste streams |
Does not create problems in recycling or residual waste |
This is important for packaging innovation. Companies should monitor future EU developments before investing heavily in new compostable packaging formats.
Compostable Packaging and EPR Data
Compostable packaging can also affect Extended Producer Responsibility data and packaging reporting.
Compostable packaging still needs to be identified, classified, and reported where required. Companies may need to know material type, weight, market, compostability status, certification, and whether the packaging is placed in an organic waste stream.
Compostable packaging data companies should collect
|
Data Category |
Examples |
|
Packaging type |
Tea bag, coffee pod, sticky label, very lightweight bag, service packaging |
|
Material composition |
Plastic, paper, coating, adhesive, ink, additive |
|
Compostability status |
Industrial compostable, home compostable, or not compostable |
|
Standard or certification |
EN 13432, recognized certification, test report |
|
Product mapping |
Which product or SKU uses the packaging |
|
Country placed on market |
National rules may differ |
|
Packaging weight |
Needed for reporting and EPR |
|
Supplier evidence |
Declaration, test report, certification |
|
Label information |
Disposal instructions and compostability label |
|
End-of-life route |
Organic waste, industrial composting, or other route |
Compostable packaging should not sit outside the company’s packaging compliance data system. It should be managed like any other regulated packaging attribute.
Common Mistakes Companies Should Avoid
Compostable packaging requirements can create risk when companies rely on assumptions, incomplete supplier claims, or vague sustainability language.
Common mistakes
|
Mistake |
Why It Creates Risk |
|
Assuming compostable packaging is always preferred |
PPWR often prioritizes material recycling |
|
Confusing biobased with compostable |
Biobased material is not automatically compostable |
|
Confusing biodegradable with compostable |
Biodegradation depends on specific conditions |
|
Using home compostable claims without evidence |
Home composting conditions are variable |
|
Ignoring national infrastructure |
Compostable packaging needs proper collection and treatment |
|
Using compostable plastic in recycling streams |
Can contaminate conventional recycling |
|
Not documenting standards or test results |
Claims may not be defensible |
|
Not controlling labels and QR content |
Consumers may receive unclear disposal instructions |
|
Applying exemptions without evidence |
Authorities may challenge unsupported assumptions |
|
Treating supplier marketing as compliance proof |
Supplier claims must be verified and stored |
A strong compliance process should replace assumptions with evidence, market mapping, supplier documentation, and controlled labelling.
Practical Compostable Packaging Readiness Roadmap
Companies can use the following roadmap to prepare for compostable packaging requirements under PPWR.
Step 1: Identify compostable or biodegradable packaging in your portfolio
List all packaging marketed as compostable, biodegradable, biobased, organic-waste compatible, or suitable for composting.
Step 2: Classify packaging by format
Identify whether each item is a tea bag, coffee pod or capsule, beverage single-serve unit, sticky label for fruit and vegetables, very lightweight plastic bag, lightweight plastic bag, or another packaging type.
Step 3: Determine whether compostability is required
Check whether the packaging falls under mandatory compostability requirements or whether compostability is optional, national, or claim-based.
Step 4: Assess whether recycling remains the priority
For other packaging types, verify whether the packaging should prioritize material recycling and whether compostability could disrupt recycling streams.
Step 5: Review Member State rules
Check whether national rules require compostability for lightweight or very lightweight plastic bags, and whether organic waste collection infrastructure exists.
Step 6: Collect supplier evidence
Request material composition, compostability certificates, test reports, standard references, substance declarations, and change notification commitments.
Step 7: Prepare technical documentation
Create a technical file showing compostability status, standards used, test evidence, packaging category, disposal route, and labelling evidence.
Step 8: Review labels and claims
Confirm that all compostability, biodegradability, biobased, and environmental claims are accurate, specific, and supported.
Step 9: Connect compostable packaging to EPR data
Record packaging weight, material type, market, supplier, certification status, and end-of-life route for reporting and compliance.
Step 10: Monitor PPWR updates
Track harmonized standards, implementing acts, Commission guidance, and future additions to the mandatory compostable packaging list.
Compostable Packaging Compliance Checklist
|
Question |
Status |
|
Have all compostable or biodegradable packaging items been identified? |
To be checked |
|
Is each packaging item mapped to products and countries? |
To be checked |
|
Is the packaging one of the mandatory compostable formats? |
To be checked |
|
Is it industrially compostable or home compostable? |
To be checked |
|
Is there a valid test report or certification? |
To be checked |
|
Is EN 13432 or another relevant method referenced? |
To be checked |
|
Does the packaging contain coatings, inks, adhesives, or additives? |
To be checked |
|
Could the packaging disrupt recycling streams? |
To be checked |
|
Is the consumer disposal instruction clear? |
To be checked |
|
Are labels and claims supported by evidence? |
To be checked |
|
Are Member State-specific rules checked? |
To be checked |
|
Is the packaging included in EPR data and reporting? |
To be checked |
|
Is the technical documentation complete? |
To be checked |
|
Is there version control for supplier or material changes? |
To be checked |
This checklist can support supplier onboarding, packaging redesign, artwork approval, market launch reviews, and internal audits.
How ComplyMarket Supports Compostable Packaging Compliance
Compostable packaging compliance under PPWR requires more than choosing a compostable material. Companies need to manage packaging classification, supplier evidence, compostability standards, technical documentation, labelling, EPR data, country-specific rules, and claims control.
ComplyMarket’s packaging compliance services explain that packaging compliance can include primary, secondary, and tertiary packaging, as well as plastic, metal, paper, cardboard, glass, wood, labels, inks, coatings, adhesives, and other packaging components. The service page also highlights that packaging compliance may include labelling, material composition, substance restrictions, recycling obligations, registration, reporting, documentation, recordkeeping, recyclability, eco-design, and EPR compliance.
ComplyMarket can help companies prepare for compostable packaging requirements by supporting:
- Identification of applicable compostable packaging requirements
- Packaging material and component data management
- Supplier declaration and certificate collection
- Compostability evidence tracking
- Technical documentation and Declaration of Conformity support
- Labelling and artwork evidence control
- Compostability, biodegradability, and biobased claim management
- Country-specific packaging requirement tracking
- EPR registration and packaging reporting data preparation
- Version control for supplier, material, artwork, or claim changes
- Audit-ready records for internal and external compliance reviews
- Digital Product Passport and circular economy data readiness
The attached workshop identifies ComplyMarket capabilities across product compliance management software, sustainability reporting software, material compliance software, packaging compliance, Extended Producer Responsibility services, Digital Product Passport, and global market access.
For companies managing multiple packaging suppliers, products, and EU markets, the challenge is not only knowing whether packaging is compostable. The real challenge is proving it, labelling it correctly, reporting it accurately, and keeping the evidence updated when materials, suppliers, claims, or rules change.
Comments
Leave a comment or ask a question
No comments yet.